0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Thanks Nao for sharing the link to this forum.I have read a lot of postings and I will tell you what I think;1.. Only two Developer is too less for a project like this (same problems as SMF itself).2.. Without testing the code (the project) I can't involve the PortaMx corp.3.. I's a fork and the license rights are not clearedSo for the moment I can nothing do or more say as I do.If you have a license for this project and you're ready to share the rights to the PortaMx corp., we can make a deal.Fel
I know, that Feline is a very good programmer as you both are too,
so it would be good, if she could do her PortaMX also for your fork.
I think she has a partner in her corporation.
Maybe she develops also other software not related to PortaMX.
Would be good, if you would look into each other´s software,when time permits and don´t "hade" each other...
P.S: I just saw, that you also run here RC4 now.
Do you also use SimpleSEF 1.1.1 or how do you do the URL Rewrite things here at noisen ?
Hello together and sorry for my inspection of aeva code discovering the problem with output buffer.
I followed the threads here and on portamx and it's a shame, that devs are going to "hade" eachother.
Fel's main language seems to be german (as mine) and she's really not "nice" to bad or wrong questions but Nao - you also keep your answer's really short to your "customers".
I hope, dev's are not going to "hade" eachother and coding goes on next weeks so all people have fun with SMF, AEVA, PORTAmx and all other useful mods on this world.
I've had my own run-ins with Feline and have to say that if you happen to disagree with her that you have to work hard to be seen as right thereafter.
I remember the time she flat out asked SlammedDime if he had a computing degree (like it was somehow relevant) in the SimpleSEF thread on sm.org for example (whereupon I joined in, since I certainly don't hold a computing degree of any kind)